Skip to main content

How Bad Are Your Cosmetics?

The other day while browsing for something I came across Skin Deep Cosmetic Safety Reviews which is hosted by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) The site contains a huge database of cosmetic products and chemicals used by the cosmetic industry, and rates each product on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 10 is the worst offender and 0 is the best.

If you look on a bottle of, say, shampoo, and write into the search box on the site some chemical name from the ingredients list (for example Ammonium Laureth Sulfate), the result will be a number of health hazards associated with that chemical as such (click the image to go to the actual entry on the website):

 

image

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ammonium Laureth Sulfate scores only a 3, so it’s not all that bad.  What’s nice is that it also displays a set of names that this chemical can be listed as, gives you a description of what it actually is, and shows you a list of cosmetic categories—and the products within—that contain this chemical.

And if you search for the product name, say PANTENE PRO-V 2 IN 1 COLOR REVIVAL SHAMPOO & CONDITIONER, it will show you the following summary (click the image to go to the actual entry on the website):

 

image

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So I’ve been using this site and searching it for all the products I use and have come to the conclusion that I should have died a horrible death long ago.

If you would like to know how these scores are calculated you can go to the Products, Scores and Methods page, which sheds some light on things. Although a product’s score may be very low (0, say), EWG cannot say that the product is necessarily safe because,as is written on the site, “since safety studies aren't required by law, for many ingredients we find no publicly available information at all".  Still, I would be fairly confident in the scores and the potential meaning of them as far as safety goes. 

Because I haven’t yet died a horrible death from all of the cosmetic crap I use, searching the site for alternatives might be a good idea.  What I would really like, and I haven’t found it on the site yet, is a way to ask for similar products with a better score.  You can do all this sort of filtering on their advanced search screen, and it’s not too bad, either.  Still, I am lazy and I would like to input all of my products and have it suggest alternatives within varying degrees of hazards.  For example, I want shampoo, toothpaste and mouthwash that contain no chemicals associated with Cancer, which can be done in the advanced search, but I would like it to produce better alternatives, and given my locale (southwestern PA), I would like to only see these alternative products in stores that are within so many miles from my home.

So check out the site.  It’s a lot of fun if you’re into such things.

Comments

Thomas Clancy said…
Um. I disagree. Say you are presented with two bottles of shampoo whose label and shape you cannot see so as to remain unbiased and are told that bottle 1 contains 85% chemicals that are shown to be hazardous to your health (e.g. cancer, Developmental & reproductive toxicity), and bottle 2 contains 5% hazardous chemicals, 95% natural substances, 75% of which are organic. If asked which one do you think is bad for you and which good, you could probably answer bottle 2 is good, bottle 1 is bad. If asked which bottle would you most likely choose, you would probably say bottle 2. Hence we have bad vs. good cosmetics as it pertains to their ingredients.

Popular posts from this blog

Brainstorming, Mind Mapping, Curio

I use this really cool Mac OS X  (I mean, is there really anything better than a Mac?) software by Zengobi called Curio.  While it lacks many of the things I would like to see in such an application--you really can't go by what I write here because what I want hasn't yet been imagined, except by me of course and I am too lazy to do anything about it--it has great potential and I think that if Zengobi has the vision it can become even more powerful which is really cool.

Part of what it gives you is mind mapping, but unlike mind mapping tools that are all about just mind mapping, Curio gives you a blank canvas onto which you can drop any kind of resource such as images, documents, web pages, etc.  And you can organize all of these sorts of things as mind maps or structured lists.  Or you don't need to do that at all.  You can just be free to layout everything randomly.



It is also a project management application, but it looks nothing like any project management software.  Th…

Quilling and Chilling

Perhaps it's because I own a scrapbooking and papercraft store.  Perhaps it is the artist within.  Perhaps it's sheer boredom as I suffer this long period of employment drought.  But whatever it is, I've decided to learn more about papercrafts and especially something called quilling or paper filigree.

I'm not quite sure why I find fascination in such things.  I am a computer geek, programmer, software developer, etc.  It must go back to my childhood and my fascination with creating arts and crafts.  As a budding artist my bud was snipped from the tree of art, and I never did pursue it. But I love color.  I love how to mix it to create new colors, how to place complimentary colors together, how to match and blend and create things with color.

The tools and the techniques of quilling are deceptively simple.  I say deceptively because although it appears at first that you are simply rolling paper around a slotted rod, forming the rolled paper into one of a few basic shapes…

Breastfeeding, Facebook, Obscenity and Idiocy

So I've been hearing on Fox Snooze that facebook had removed a photo of a woman who was breastfeeding her child public (as apposed to an adult, which is a separate issue entirely).  Facebook did concede and allow these sorts of photos to be posted, but there still might be a lawsuit brought against them by a coalition of women.  Whatever.

Now, two opposing views, both by women.  One says that it's a natural thing to breastfeed an infant and that it is not pornography nor is it obscene, which is facebook's policy for sensoring photos that are "pornography" and/or "obscene".  The other says that she doesn't want to see this on facebook, that this sort of thing should be done at home in private.

I see problems with both arguments.  First, yes, it is a natural thing to breastfeed.  But is having sex and nudity.  Why?  Most everyone has sex, and I imagine that it is prevalent to have sex in the nude, unless you consider dry humping whatever the hell tha…